SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : CONSPIRACY THEORIES
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (76)1/20/2005 7:39:13 AM
From: sea_urchin  Read Replies (2) of 418
 
Gus > My and others' theory: the simultaneous underwater bursts of 5 or 6 one-megaton nukes. Evidence of such? Hydroacoustic data? Satellite pics? Radioactive fallout? Not available. Not my business. Classified.

So now there's an impasse. As Lord Rumsfeld said, in one of his famous sayings, "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence (of WMDs)". Now, in like manner, you say absence of Hydroacoustic data, Satellite pics and Radioactive fallout is not evidence of a natural phenomenon.

But as I said, there IS more than enough seismographic evidence from stations all around the world and none of that seismographic evidence demonstrates the typical spike of one or more nuclear explosions. You, however, do not regard that as evidence and prefer to base your theory on material which is unavailable.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News