I thought my posting was balanced and if anything suggested caution
pointing out that prln is not a sure thing even if they have a good
approach and good products because of the power of the major
companies. In fact, after your posting pg, a self-described
prln bull, suggested I was hypercritical. The sentence you highlighted,
however, is an unintended overstatement. As RD surmised, I am just
another investor with no special or recent info on AndorVir and didn't
mean to imply there are good results in the current phase of study on
AndroVir. I thought I remembered being told, a few months ago or more,
that the safety phase went well with possible indications of some good
things beyond that. That would have been totally unofficial comment
and you are right, as far as I know, that there have been no official
results announced. I apparently did not document this conversation in
my own files either and it is therefore possible I am recalling comments
about AndroCar. I am glad you picked up on this and am glad to know
about this message board. I can see the people here are knowledgeable
and it is good to know the postings are closely read. This will help
me to be more careful and precise in future postings.
I certainly hope it wasn't my posting that resulted in the stock
going up yesterday. As I watched the action, I decided that at this
point going up on relatively low volume was a good sign so I bought
another 1000 shares at 2 9/16 which was the high of day, such a brief
high that I may have been the only one to hit it. If my posting had
that much effect, my disclaimer will drive prln back to 1.5 and I will
look even more foolish---I kid, of course, but the irony would not be
lost on me even though prln is clearly an investment for the
intermediate to long term.
Do you or does anyone else know of any results from the safety phase
on AndroVir or has anyone gotten any such comment about the safety
phase as I thought I remembered??
lk lundwall
|
