Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tralfasador who wrote (88069)	11/18/2004 4:39:14 PM
From: Janice Shell	of 122087

Not really. So it can now be argued that Mr. Elgindy was reporting things to the FBI and SEC, not for the act of reporting it, but for the ability to extract (glean) information out them. In court, it's difficult to attempt to prove what a defendant "intended" when he took an action. You can propose it, but will the jury believe it? From what I've read about the present case, I think the prosecution has some problems. Cleveland clearly came across as a greedy creep, and his testimony suggests that he and Royer had much more to do with each other and with the dissemination of information than did Elgindy. It's especially damning that Cleveland apparently made up some of his "information". Did Royer ever say that the information he passed on to Cleveland was "confidential"? If he did, did Cleveland tell that to Elgindy? If so, would Tony have bragged about it as openly as he did? It certainly doesn't look to me as if Tony "solicited" any information; the chief "operators" here seem to be Royer and Cleveland. It's all very interesting, and I'm sure that it'll continue to be.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next