SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: xrayview who wrote (90135)1/26/2005 4:25:16 PM
From: olivier asser  Read Replies (1) of 122087
 
Guess what: the parties that filed that motion did an end run around my litigation in Virginia federal court. The Pennsylvania judge who issued that order did so when a Chief United Stats Judge in Virginia had granted me leave to file an amended complaint, and had NOT judicially noticed the PA court's order. So, I follow the orders of one federal judge and I'm held in contempt by another.

The attorneys in that motion requested that they be awarded sanctions in the form of attorney's fees for filing that motion. After the motion was granted, I warned them that if they made any attempt whatsoever along those lines then I would be suing them for fraud for deliberately concealing from a federal court facts surrounding Bentley's insider trading of $117 million in illegally obtained funds through Southwest Securities of Dallas, Texas against all TP members including myself. In fact, I have several signed letters from SEC enforcement staff attorneys thanking me for my aid in directing them towards Bentley's offshore assets in the Turks and Caicos, Bentley Trading, Limited, now frozen.

So, the result? No motion for attorney's fees. I was very tempted to sue that law firm, but I have enough on my plate as it is. But, if they're watching, if there is any further interference in my claims, I certainly will sue them.

While we're on the subject of sanctions and the like, in Texas federal court Berber and Moor filed to enjoin me from filing further legal action against them while seeking that I be declared a vexations litigant. The result? On December 3, 2004 from the bench United States District Judge Sam Sparks stated that he was not going to enjoin anything at this stage.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext