The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread.

QCOM 177.35

+0.6%

9:32 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: Maurice Winn	2/12/2011 1:30:09 PM
	1 Recommendation of 12247

Women running world class top companies. Even with purely intellectual activities, women are not able to be the top-notch total all-around winner. Take chess for example. The probability of having a winning woman is low. There are two main reasons: 1....They are not poisoned by testosterone as much as men, who are suicidally competitive. Demented and driven to compete to be the alpha male. By definition, women are not the alpha males. Nature has seen to it that men are driven to compete like maniacs. Even if only 1 out of 100 survives, that's enough to maintain the burgeoning population. In case some of them think they'll just hang out and smell the roses, like Ferdinand the Bull silvertongue7.tripod.com nature gives men a good dose of testosterone to stir them up. 2....To succeed in Darwinian competition, men need more development time as boys to absorb the lessons of life, so nature keeps them as boys three years longer than for girls who will predominantly have children and hide in the cave while the men go out and fight tigers and other men with sharp sticks and clubs [dangerous occupations requiring much skill]. The point of the extra three years - you can't teach an old dog new tricks. So, with testosterone and an extra 3 years of brain development, the very best males probabilistically have serious advantages over women of equal genetic endowment. It's true it's politically incorrect, but true anyway. <A male-female mean difference in g of 0.162 SD exists in favor of men, equivalent to 2.43 IQ points. The female g distribution is narrower than the male, with a variance ratio (F/M) of 0.916 > lagriffedulion.f2s.com Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next