Investment Chat Board Lawsuits Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (9489)	3/15/2006 8:08:04 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) of 12465

Re: 3/15/06 - [EAG] Court Docs: Eagle Broadband v Does 1-25 EAGLE BROADBAND v. DOES SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA EAGLE BROADBAND, INC., Plaintiff, vs. DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. 1-05-CV-050179 For a docket listing that should be up-to-date, but doesn't include any images of the listed documents, see the court's docket page at: sccaseinfo.org The listing below is my copy of that page, with the addition of the full titles and images of many of the documents. Please direct any questions or comments about this page to Al Petrofsky <al@petrofsky.org>. (To answer the most obvious question: No, I am not a party to this case. At least, I don't believe I am, but I suppose it's impossible to say so definitively when most of the parties have only been identified as Does 8 through 25. I can say that I have never used any of the seven pseudonyms named in the complaint, that I have never had any financial interest in Eagle Broadband, and that I hadn't even heard of Eagle Broadband until I read a news report about this case.) etc. eagle.petrofsky.org

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next