SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy of Death, Disease, Depravit
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (89)10/1/2015 2:02:38 PM
From: Brumar89   of 1308
 
There are still adoption agencies ... they are NOT "baby farms." There are still white children needing adoption. It isn't mostly white unwed mothers getting abortions, in fact the opposite is true.

The main source of funds was in requiring that the family of the teenage mother as well as the family which hoped to adopt a child had to become members of the sponsoring church and fork over 10% of their wealth to the charlatan in charge.

This is a lie from the pit of hell. The only church I know of which tries to enforce tithing is the Mormon church. In order to be allowed to take part in church services, they're supposed to have a meeting with their bishop annually and they are asked if they're tithing. They say yes or no but even they don't check.

I don't know of any other churches who do that. Forced titling would be impossible to enforce. And if they tried, no one would belong to the church. Furthermore your earlier lie about Child Protective Services removing adopted children over non-tithing ... that is silly too. Anyone can report anonymously any one to child welfare agencies, but they do their own investigation. They don't just take someone's word and remove kids. In fact, they prefer not to remove kids. They know they're used by crazy relatives, vengeful divorced partners, and just plain wicked people.

My wife has reminded me that Edna Gladney has always had a good reputation as an adoption service. I regret associating them with the baby mills without evidence.

Good. But you were willing to slander a good adoption agency. And you're still doing it applying the same lie to mythical unnamed "baby farms."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News