SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (97944)4/19/2015 6:57:26 PM
From: John3 Recommendations

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™
Honey_Bee
pogbull

  Read Replies (2) of 103300
 
That's exactly right. Even if someone is stopped by the most obtuse and unreasonable cop in the world, he should have the common sense to recognize the cop's demeanor and NOT pi$$ him off. Comply, because it is not a case of citizen v. cop. It's a case of citizen v. the entire law enforcement community. Guess who wins.

I laugh my a$$ off when I see the idiots talking trash, and saying really stupid things like, "Dat pig aintz gone tells me sumfin when I aintz dun nuffins, god-dammit! Fu¢k dat! I gotz my civil rightz."

It's no wonder that so many Blacks are dusted off by the police.

I would never get into an argument with a police officer who challenged me, regardless of race. Hell, I wouldn't even be a wise guy and ask him for his name and badge number. Everyone knows that there is a record of his name and badge number and the date/time of the incident. If I feel that I was wronged, I would document the incident afterwards, and pay my attorney to address it, assuming that I felt strongly enough about it. There is a legal procedure to address such grievances, but while in the presence of the cop, one should remain calm, non-confrontational, polite and cooperative. Chances are that if it's something minor and you're not wanted for homicide, the police officer will let you go with a warning.

Regarding fleeing from the police, that is a major no-no and a crime. The officer is well within his rights to shoot the perp down, and yes, in the back. All he has to say is that in his opinion, the perp posed a violent threat to public safety. Fighting with the police and then fleeing the scene of the crime is considered a violent crime, and lethal force is authorized, period. Fu¢k the media for trying to obfuscate the issue and portraying that criminal son-of-a-bit¢h as an innocent victim. That's bull$hit! He got exactly what he deserved.

I believe that the officer in SC will be found innocent of all charges under the law, and I hope the he files a civil lawsuit against the mayor and police department for wrongful termination. Of course, I also believe that he will face a civil lawsuit himself from the perp's family, and civil right's charges from that racist $hithead, Holder, and the anti-White Injustice Department.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext