SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jlallen who wrote (94)5/25/1998 6:57:00 PM
From: Dragonfly  Read Replies (1) of 880
 
The Tripp tapes are plenty of proof

Lets look it up for you: (from websters online)
Proof:
2. That degree of evidence which convinces the mind of any truth or fact, and produces belief; a test by facts or arguments that induce, or tend to induce, certainty of the judgment; conclusive evidence; demonstration.

See that word certainty there? Notice the use of the word conclusive? Shall I get those definitions too?

Monica could easily have been lying to Tripp, therfore, recordings of these conversations are, by definition, not proof.

As to whether they are evidence, well, I'll take sworn testimony more seriously anyday. So will a judge. So, if she lied in that testimony, they will have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

But, you can say you have some evidence. However, there is stronger evidence that directly contradicts it.

Dragonfly

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext