SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (990044)12/23/2016 11:43:22 PM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations

Recommended By
locogringo
one_less
Stock Puppy

  Read Replies (1) of 1569482
 
Yes, if there were no guns it would mean none were available to the victims. Just because there are a great number of crimes and a great number of guns doesn't mean a lot of people had access to firearms at the time a crime was committed against them. Many cities where crime is rampant have strict laws denying conceal carry or open carry of weapons.

I believe Montana has the best record on gun ownership, carry concealed or open(visible). Seems they have a lower rate of serious crimes against person per 100K population by a large %.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News