SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Binary Hodgepodge

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFileNext 10PreviousNext  
To: ~digs who started this subject4/3/2001 1:50:03 AM
From: ~digs   of 6763
 
> i've got a conspiracy theory
> and it goes like this
> based on the notion that we can't figure out jack about actual naz volume and how they're counting it
> would it be reasonable to surmise that they did get rid of the double count?
<}XXX{> dunno
> at just about the right time so as to not show how high volume these selloffs have been
<}XXX{> not sure what is up with that
> i mean
> i'm looking at jnpr, csco, jdsu.. whatever
> (in the weekly)
> and the volume is quite tremendous
> more so than at any time in the past
> (as far as i can tell)
> i mean that kinda makes sense
> in that as a stock get cheaper one can buy and sell larger lots with the same amount of dollars
<}XXX{> so where is the problem?
> no problem really
> just a vast conspiracy theory
> kinda ironic that these volume levels are showing up at about the time they overhaul the volume count
> and i think it's really weird... that we haven't seen any literature about it
> like it was just done in passing or something
> "ah we're swithin to decimals... we might as well change the volume count too"
> <shrug>
<}XXX{> i thought we were not sure that they overhauled the volume counts
> that's just it... why don't we know the definitive answer?
> i know i heard cnbc say something about it
> or at least i thought i did
> ...
> just ran a search for 'nasdaq and volume and count'
> nasdaqtrader.com
> News coverage of exchange stocks. Features comprehensive trading volume reports.
> nasdaqtrader.com
> fock
> it's blank
> somehow that doesn't surprise me
> it's labeled as nasdaq administration notices
> nasdaqtrader.com
> mostly decimalization news in that list there
> nuthin on volume
<}XXX{> don't see it
<}XXX{> more cmgi added to QQQ tho!
> hahaha
> i didn't notice :)
<}XXX{> sleep!
> okay, nite
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFileNext 10PreviousNext