Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 175.32

+0.3%

Dec 8 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ramsey Su who wrote (10029)	4/20/1998 10:32:00 PM
From: JMD	Read Replies (1) of 152472

Ramsey-dude, "not a single Q cheerleader"---well, summmabitch boy, all you had to do is ask. You folks have sent a new record for off-topicitis; told you it would be a tough month once you stepped in to doggie poo politics. (down, puppy: generic reference only). Surfer Mike is in a 'SHOW ME THE MONEY' mood, and me-thinks we're going to get it. Now why three million shares would change hands today suggests to my cynical surfer's heart that the tasseled loafers have figured out what Gregg has been hammering on: cell phones still selling like hotcakes even in the dreaded SEA. Could it be they got a sneaky-peek? Nahh; that wouldn't be fair and we all know this is a fair game. Man, did you all see those Canadian dudes just can't get enough of the stuff and had to let new contracts down San Diego way? Things gettin' a little tight in the old spectrum? What technology could possibly bring relief? Holy ASIC's--why didn't BatWing get the call? Party hearty laddies (and dudettes too, though don't see to many here after the shareholder meeting debacle). We're going to Disneyland. SM

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next