"In latin, which is what it is derived, it is subjugated to -fidant/-dence ..inflicting your connotation as an anomoly at best. Con-vict, subjagating it to -vict, or AGAINST / VICTIM is the proper deriviation.",
To:Markas who wrote (8522)
From: Pugs Friday, Oct 24, 1997 6:21 PM
View Replies (3) | Respond to of 55353
Markas, your definition is wrought with fault. The prefix 'con' = 'against' by DEFINITION it is the antithesis of what you state. In latin, which is what it is derived, it is subjugated to -fidant/-dence ..inflicting your connotation as an anomoly at best. Con-vict, subjagating it to -vict, or AGAINST / VICTIM is the proper deriviation.
I would suggest you are Short on RMIL, are here to discredit Riley, and in truth , only discredit yourself w/ your silly definitions. The french have assimilated 'con' -ard, tu piges?, Pugs
Message 2543833 |
