Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Carragher who wrote (104119)	3/12/2005 7:56:11 AM
From: JDN	Read Replies (1) of 793936

I think this situation is an example of COMPLACENCY. Its even worse then generally known. For example, he took that gun away from the deputy in the NEW COURTHOUSE, then instead of fleeing, he crossed over to the old courthouse where his court was located OBVIOUSLY looking for someone. Personally, I think it was the prosecuting attorney but instead found only the judge and the clerk. Why in the world he shot the clerk is a mystery to me, she was harmless to his trial. Everyone seems to feel the judge treated him very fairly so even that is a mystery. So, in the end, he failed to shoot anyone that he could reasonably blame for his situation even in a demented mind even though he obviously was hunting someone down. Now, I agree he should have had more guards, her holster should have not been presented in a way he could grab the gun, it should have been the lockable type. One could go on and on but the bottom line is COMPLACENCY. I do not agree that EVERY PRISONER should be shackled in court because of this and I am certainly not a Liberal. jdn

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next