SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill3/15/2005 8:58:36 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 793916
 
COURTHOUSE RULES [John Derbyshire]
Following my Radio Derb comments on the Atlanta horror, I have had a number of emails from law-enforcement folk and court officers, expressing disbelief at the sloppy and hazardous procedures apparently in force at the Atlanta courthouse. The following is representative. (I have removed some identifying information.)

"Dear Mr. Derbyshire---I listened to your commentary on the Atlanta shooting. I would like to add some information to it. I am a [**]-year veteran Senior Court Officer of the New York State Courts. I am assigned to the [****] County Court where I serve also as a training officer. I have read only accounts of the shooting and have not spoken to any witnesses and I can tell you there is a serious need of policy change, or some heads should roll as a result of world class negligence on the part of the court security unit.

"Firstly, while it may be law in the state of Georgia regarding a handcuffed inmate being presented to a jury, we face the same problems in NY. However, we solve that problem by bringing in a defendant, uncuffing them and seating them. When we are all in place, the jury is produced and we proceed. We are in relatively close proximity to the defendant. The jury may surmise anything they wish, but they cannot make decisions based on surmise and supposition. It is common in fact for a defense lawyer to openly admit his client is incarcerated and that incarceration is not an indication of guilt. I am stunned that this is not practice in the Atlanta court system, perhaps it will be now.

"As far as the sole officer escorting an inmate: This is close to insanity and if this is their policy, I'm surprised that this hasn't happened before. No officer, is EVER allowed to escort an imate by themselves in a NY courtroom. No officer unless it is an emergency situation is armed near an inmate.

"We recently had an individual attempt an escape from a court room. He was 6' 4" about 220 lbs. It took 5 fairly large sized officers to subdue and handcuff him. All 5 officers required medical treatment afterwards and one officer is still out on sick/injured leave. Unlike television and movies, handcuffing an uncooperative person while maintaining professional restraint is a most difficult task. When he returned to court at the next appearance, he had numerous escorts plus added units deployed in the courtroom. Guess what -- not a peep out of him.

"I hope that this was an aberration in Atlanta and was not foretold by the programs, policies and budget considerations of the Atlanta Court System."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext