SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: KLP who wrote (105389)3/22/2005 1:59:54 PM
From: MulhollandDrive   of 793782
 
Has there been any accounting of what he did with his share and also Terri's share of the nearly $2,000,000? Probably not. He is her 'guardian.'

He could have taken his portion of the $400,000, paid whatever bills he had at that point, and gotten a divorce. The $1.3 million that Terri received, could have paid whatever bills she had, and the rest gone to her care at the nursing home.
When those funds were depleted, she would have gone onto Medicaid

greed is a very destructive motivation

i'm quite convinced he did not count on the time and money it would take to litigate against the family while seeking the termination of terri's life
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News