SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board
ZEN.V 1.1200.0%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: NLWest who wrote (10551)2/15/2017 10:20:40 AM
From: Chupacabra1Read Replies (1) of 12350
 
You have to love this article "informants speculate" Who is this informant? Anyone that good with numbers must be a billionaire investor.How in good faith does the Globe allow such National Enquirer type articles to be printed..100 jobs 50 year life span...Blah,blah,blah,blah.......The company can't post this information because it is not conforming to IROC regulations .Instead a informant...Too frigging funny boys.

<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-N9L7TF" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden"></iframe>
News Link CCB.v
''from a CAPEX perspective, according to the Canada Carbon PEA, the cost of getting into the marble quarrying business is on the order of $3.8 million dollars. The internal rate of return is 450% and the CAPEX payback is three months, based on revenues from only half of the planned marble production. Little wonder my informant “fell off his chair”.

'' L
eave aside my informant’s speculation as to Canada Carbon being able to obtain prices higher than $184 a tonne for its marble; just at that price the company could have positive, free, cash flow in a matter of months without significant dilution. In my earlier article comparing Canada Carbon to Nemaska Lithium I suggested that a graphite off take agreement could rocket Canada Carbon’s market cap from its current $20 million to a market cap closer to Nemaska’s $400 million. But I did not consider the implications of a significant, steady, free cash flow from marble operations. These implications are obviously positive. In particular, positive cash flow at this early stage may allow Canada Carbon to use debt financing to bring its graphite into production. ''

so CCB has a cash flow right off the get go to help fund their Graphite Mine start up, scheduled to begin production of the PUREST GRAPHITE on planet earth , BAR NONE , in early 2018 to minimize SP dilution, with a MINIMAL ecological footprint, how good is that ? Employing approximately 100 people in the community with a mine of an initial 50 year life span , with spinoffs of ?? cutting edge Graphene/Graphite laboratories ? , sculpturing ? tax revenue, jobs, jobs , jobs .

How does this not fly ??

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext