Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (105582)	3/23/2005 2:51:02 PM
From: one_less	of 793801

"I don't question that there some bad actors or some bad acts that have occurred during this ordeal." It all turns around Michael S. He is the guardian but he does not have the right to 'decide' for Terri. There are people able and willing to care for her. There are no 'medical' procedures keeping her alive, unless you consider feeding someone a medical procedure. Michael has moved on with his life and no longer has an active interest in what happens. He has another life with another woman etc. He may be a the highly principled character who wants to see Terri's wishes honored... If people believed that, this case would have been over long ago. One possibility is for Michael to convince everyone he is being honorable (now in question due to nurse and family allegations). Seems like that is do-able via investigations and lie detectors etc. Not so much considering everything else that is involved. "I don't think anyone deserves to suffer over this. (Except the political opportunists and hypsters, that is. <g>)" Agreed.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next