Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LLCF who wrote (106848)	6/6/2001 11:34:42 AM
From: flatsville	Read Replies (3) of 436258

>>>your continued rant after his post makes no sense to me but whatever:<<< Well, that was obvious. But I'll try one last time-- How could my assertion that only 25% (a quarter) of minimum wage workers are clearly students living at home without the family responsibility based on age (19 yrs old and younger) possibly support Les' argument that the number is 33% (a third) without family responsibility based on their status as part time workers? How can my number, which is 25% not having family obligations, possibly support his number, which is 33% not having family obligations, when my number is clearly less-- not equal to or greater than? What skewed, bizarre mathematical world do you inhabit?<ggg> Is it in fact some version of "Back to the Future" where not only the laws of time and space are in play but the basics of elementary school math as well? Hello Mc Fly? I take it you liked that trilogy quite a bit. My kid does too. I thought part III was weak.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next