The Residential Real Estate Crash Index Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (106852)	2/27/2008 10:26:06 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone	Read Replies (1) of 306849

Frustrated? Think of how the non lawyer reacts. This is turning lawyers into fools. ======================= Imo requiring the foreclosing party to produce the original note or assignment is stupid as all get out, there is no reason why a copy that is sworn to be authentic can't get the job done ... why the heck would anyone trust the clerk of the court with the original of the note? You had to trust them with the original deed and mortgage to get them recorded, but they send the originals back to you. It's much better to rely on an authenticated copy.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next