SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Fonar - Where is it going?
FONR 18.55+0.1%Jan 7 3:58 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SpinShooter who wrote (10707)8/6/1998 10:19:00 AM
From: Michelino   of 19354
 
Spinshooter,

Perhaps you missed some of my posts, but about your claim that Fonar action against GE "was NOT a Patent Court suit". ...It seems that the Official US Patent and Trademark office has no record of any "Patent Court" system in this country.

Message 5416028

So where can we find this "Patent Court" of your?

And among other earlier statements there was this from you:

"The Appeals Court found for FONAR, and said a Trial Judge in a civil suit cannot set aside a jury award. It was never about "first patent", or who "invented a technique". It was about Jury decisions, and if a trial judge can dismiss jury award"

I provided several links, including the text of the original decision itself that conflicts with your claim:

Message 5413244

How do you resolve the conflict between your version and the US Circuit court's version?

I'm having trouble finding the WSJ article to which you refer in:

"It was about inventors who had learned best how to use the "system" for US Patents, etc. "

Can you provide a more concrete reference here?

Regards,
Michael
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext