SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Duncan Baird who wrote ()4/29/2000 8:06:00 AM
From: boris_a  Read Replies (1) of 1575622
 
MSFT and some observations from over the pond

I'm pleased to watch how many people here are recognizing the importance of law and its application in order to grant FAIR business practice, even if their portfolio goes down somewhat. (BTW, I own some MSFT too. I'm disappointed. I've never seen a company acting more stupidly than this one under such circumstances. It's arrogance is merely unsupportable.)

In these days of ever growing giant companies the danger of cheating the consumer is for sure getting bigger. So congrats to every country and government having a law and a administration to handle competition issues also in favour of the consumer and not only to protect the producer interest. (Patents, brands, intellectual property and so on). We just shouldn't forget: companies have big advantages by just the same law. You cannot write a PC OS and call it Windows. Why not? One can argue this would be of benefit to the consumer by getting more competition and better products. So at least Mr. Gates seems to like the protection by law. He just doesn't like his duties by law. This is surely human and understandable. But not acceptable.

BTW, heaving heard the word communism: having a monopoly producer being able to charge prices not related to effective costs and to deliver a unified product to everyone having no other choice ..... that's the essential idea of a communistic production system, in my eyes. This being granted worldwide (yes, granted! that's the point) by a liberal economic order would be the climax of irony.

Boris

PS. I hear always the name of *bad woman* Janet Reno and never the name of judge Jackson. Wasn't he the one doing the finding of facts? Wasn't he the one deciding?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext