SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (109687)4/16/2005 7:34:30 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) of 793800
 
What makes you think it's not valid?

Actually, I was into that one sentence response this thread sometimes inspires.

I've got two sort of umbrella reasons. The first is that the so-called "partial birth abortion" legislation is simply part of a longer term strategy to cut Roe v Wade to bits, small bites at a time. Particularly, since the original decision made it clear that the state played a role in late term abortions. I wish to oppose that strategy wherever it rears its head.

The second is that, from the little I read about it at the time, I came to the conclusion that most of such abortions take place when there is serious risk to the health of the mother, sometimes a threat of death. I am under the impression these are rather serious procedures, much different from early term abortions.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News