SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: riversides who wrote (110015)3/28/2010 2:05:26 PM
From: Broken_Clock1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 116555
 
SATURDAY, MARCH 27, 2010

Every silver lining has a little tarnish

Sure, you're probably disappointed in the health insurance bill. But you're not the only one:

Even the insurance industry is unhappy. Although the federal government will be requiring Americans to buy their products -- and providing subsidies worth billions -- insurers don't think the penalties are high enough.

Really puts our petty complaints into perspective, doesn't it?

AND: In case you're wondering:

Those who continue to go without coverage will have to pay a penalty to the IRS, except in cases of financial hardship. Fines vary by income and family size. For example, a single person making $45,000 would pay an extra $1,125 in taxes when the penalty is fully phased in, in 2016.

That's 2.5% of this hypothetical single person's salary. For comparison purposes, UnitedHealth Group had 2009 revenues of $87 billion, so a corresponding penalty of 2.5% for its numerous misdeeds would be roughly $2.2 billion. Which isn't high enough either, wouldn't you say? So you can see their point.

Posted by John Caruso at 10:27 AM | Permalink | Comments (4)
distantocean.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext