The Arabs, Christian, Moslem, and Jewish do have a right to rule those lands, since they are predominately Arab lands.
Those same Arabs certainly have a right to rule over folks who come from Europe, America, North Africa and in some cases, Iraq, Syria, and Jordan.
If the British were part of an un-civil action (colonialism) should the wrong be resolved with another wrong? To dismantle one colonialism with form another, the other made up of foreigners from half-way around the globe?
I do not hear Arabs complaining about "oppressed classes", especially American and European Jews "winding up on top", as you put it, or being successful?
If that were the case, how did Iraqi Jews prosper in Iraq, prior to the establishment of Israel?
Did the Iraqi Jews steal their wealth?
What oppressed Jews are you referring to?
The Arab's treatment of their own is not absolved, but in light of colonial action by Zionists, and the support by American and European taxpayers, Israel gets special attention on two counts.
Is the complaint, by supporters of Israeli colonialism, of what Arabs do to their own, a dodge or diversion? |
