SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (111066)8/20/2011 5:45:32 PM
From: locogringo5 Recommendations   of 224750
 
loco, you have made an argument for the Court to uphold the validity of the entire Act. The Court is already convinced that the remainder of the Act is constitutional. The Act needs the mandate to work. The court knows the act needs the mandate to work.

Of course I have, kenny, but it's going to depend not on logic or what makes it work, but on the constitution. You are a lawyer..........I am not....so you know the difference. That rag still means a lot to many people. Progressives don't like it, but then, most people don't like Progressives.

It's a battle of States rights over a Federal monopoly or oligopoly, and I chose those words purposely.

One more court decision, then the Supreme Court, with one or two justices bowing out.

Are you a betting man? :--)

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext