Fighting the PC war
buzzmachine.com
By jarvis on Terrorism
: Tonight's 60 Minutes tried to act as if it blew the lid off Guantanamo Bay... but the worst they got from Sgt. Erik Saar, a former translator now cashing in on his time on the island with a book, is this about a female officer and a detainee:
"As she stood in front of him, she slowly started to unbutton her army blouse. She had on underneath the Army blouse a tight brown Army T-shirt, touched her breasts, and said, 'Don't you like these big American breasts?'" says Saar. "She wanted to create a barrier between this detainee and his faith, and if she could somehow sexually entice him, he would feel unclean in an Islamic way, he would not be able to pray and go before his God and gain that strength, so the next day, maybe he would be able to start cooperating, start talking to her."
And then she unbuttoned her pants, acted as if she was getting menstrual blood on her fingers -- actually ink -- and put it on the prisoner, telling him her could not bathe and thus cleanse himself of this sin before praying.
Saar says she did this to a Saudi who took flying lessons in the U.S. He says this is a guy who should be locked away forever.
Now the technique may be infantile or ridiculous or stupid. But it is not torture.
And if this Saudi was taking flying lessons in the U.S. -- do we sense a pattern? -- then I see nothing wrong with trying use his own ridiculous views of women to get intelligence out of him to try to prevent the next mass murder.
CBS correspondent Scott Pelley says just what he should say: "You know, there are people at home watching this right now, saying, 'Hey, you've got to do what you've got to do.'" But the sarge replies that the technique isn't effective. Well, sarge, I'd say that's not up to you to decide. You're a translator -- before you decided to make a buck off dissing your former colleagues.
There are mentions of other allegations at Guantamamo and frankly I would not be surprised -- and would disapprove -- if physical torture were used. And I don't doubt Saar's contention that most of the detainees are inconsequential (but who knows which ones?).There are mentions of the contentions of the prisoners, but I'd take those with a block of salt. There are no smoking cattle prods here. FBI memos mentioned in the report alleged a few bent thumbs and over-zealous duct-taping. But it's still not torture. It's war. Yet this report acts as if we must conduct that war under PC terms: Can't offend this Saudi who took flying lessons in the U.S. No, that would be wrong.
Uh, who says? |
