Yes i too got tired of arguing this, a long time ago, the thing is the other side of the argument keeps getting pumped here by certain zionist promoters, ahem, and it becomes a one-sided story when there is weeping and gnashing of teeth on behalf of the few casualties taken by one side, while all losses of the indigenous, their far greater casualties and their lands stolen, are downplayed
Look, not many years ago these were muslim lands, never mind that the brits administered them for a while, they weren't injecting some goofy religion, they were just trying to keep the peace ... they were muslim lands, with muslim population majority
Now, the whole area between Jordan and the sea is dominated by a state that is set up expressly to be a 'homeland for the jews' .... let me repeat that for emfasis - 'for the jews'
If that's not an invasion, the term has no meaning .... if it is not dispossession, then none of us have right to land anywhere .... claiming to have robbed other [or the same?] people of this same land some two dozens centuries back is simply not adequate justification for doing so now, in the eyes of the Rest of Us ... it's you who must deal with this michael, you know it to be the most fundamental fact of this Judenstaat, and it will be that an hundred years from now, you'll be dealing with this a long long time
Strip this demented project of the religion .... just the religion, that's all, put front and centre in the constitucion that all persons are equal before the law ..... and by all means change the name ... how about Agnosticstan ... then you could have a state religion with short and sweet scripture - 'Well we dunno what god's name is or what she wants us to do, so we'll wait for her to tell us, and meantime you kids be good to each other, and eat your spinach, dammit' |
