Mark, I think our understandings of digital watermarking are pretty-much in sync. I will disagree with you on the "hacker" issue, though - the digital watermark must be detectable, in order to be useful. If it detectable, then it is removable. Probably not forgable, however, so perhaps the absence of a watermark would be a tell-tale clue to piracy. But while the absence of a watermark might prove piracy, with the watermark removed, the source would not be tracable.
Yes, I agree that the VTT/TTV market is their real bread and butter. It's what they have now that is real. However, that market is not large enough to support EDIG's market capitalization. All this nonsense about the consumer audio market is needed to support the stock price. They have have wonderful VTT/TTV products, and may even come to dominate that market. Still won't support the stock price.
BTW, no I don't know what it is that all VTT devices have in common that EDIG is expert at. How about just telling me, and not continuing this silly game of 20 questions?
Again, don't do it for me - do it for those new investors that this stock so desparately needs. Why not make it easy for them to find information by providing it here, rather than playing guessing games? |
