SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (112476)12/12/2000 3:42:20 PM
From: Knight  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
<As a hypothetical, if a voter started by pushing firmly, but not firmly enough to dislodge the chad but eventually broke through, wouldn't that voter be inclined to continue
pushing through from that point on?>

It's possible. However, there's no way to distinguish between the hypothetical case you mention and the hypothetical case where a voter starts to vote and decides not to do so. Because the interpretation of said ballot is ambiguous, the voter's intent does not meet the standard of "clear." At some point, you have to leave the burden on the voter to follow directions. Granted, the Florida standard of "voter intent is clear" is gracious, to some degree, to voters who make error. However, it uses the word "clear" and not "probable" and, hence, allows for much less subjectivity than has been alleged by those who support the looser standards.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext