Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: lorne who wrote (112953)	9/15/2011 10:27:44 AM
From: TideGlider	3 Recommendations of 224738

That argument is sound, but it is actually much worse for Hillary now. Fast and Furious is beginning to open and I personally believe Hillary also had her hands in that. I remember her clearly making a speech from Mexico about US weapons flowing into Mexico. At the time the remark seemed to be the administration attempting to control US weapons in the states and using Mexican violence to demonstrate the need. Flash forward: US agents killed by weapons that Fast and Furious allowed to pass into Mexico. Gun violence in Mexico multiplies geometrically. Is there anyone who would believe the Secretary of State would not have be alerted to a plan to allow weapons to be taken and sold to cartel members , gangs etc in a foreign country? The answer to that is "no way"! and that is supported by her "US gun" speeches from Mexico. I don't believe in coincidence. Hillary will be exposed as will Holder and Obama. Some close aids my fall on the sword for Obama and Hillary, but it won't wash. In the legal world lets say you are applying for a search warrant and you of course need evidence to justify the warrant. One element is predictable information or statements. Hillary's 2009 speech would have justified the US clamping down on US gun trade, purchasing, ownership and new qualifications. However, that was before the incredible gun violence in Mexico escalated, American Agents were slain and the exposure of our government not only allowing but encouraging the sales and release of thousands of weapons heading to the gangs and cartels. I believe Hillary would attempt to run for president if she believed she could destroy evidence of her knowledge of the Fast and Furious debacle. However, there is no way such an plan would not have involved the US State Department at the highest levels. What we have here is rube administration officials believing they could pull off a scheme the CIA would never even touch. That is my story and I am sticking to it. ;^) The fish rots from the head down and the entire administration and all their appointees have to be tried for crimes committed and others simply sent to the unemployment lines. Keep your eyes on the ball. What we need now is Special Prosecutor to circumvent Holder and the threat of prison over the head of actors who would only be offered a new job or resignation by the administration. That does not encourage the telling of the entire story. I believe the investigation is on the right track, but it will take a Special Prosecutor to get to the bottom of this...or "the top" as is much more likely.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next