SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mohan Marette who wrote (1132)5/30/1998 1:36:00 PM
From: Rational  Read Replies (1) of 12475
 
TOI
Friday 22 May 1998

timesofindia.com

How the West Won

The recent G-15 summit of developing nations and the almost parallel
G-8 meeting of leaders of the developed world shows that the
world's two halves share little -- except perhaps for the irony of
aspiration. A new book, The Wealth and Poverty of Nations
examines almost exactly this issue, though author David Landes has
gone considerably further back in time to document and analyse the
world's economic history. Mr Landes is professor of history and
economics at Harvard University and he has gone pretty far down the
road of geographical determinism to answer the question posed in the
book's sub-title: ''Why some are so rich and some are so poor''. But
he has also made a significantly bold assertion about why the world
is the way it is, quoting a French historian who said that if history
were to start over, it would broadly repeat itself. Though the book
flirts with geographical determinism -- natural water systems,
patterns of irrigation and cultivation that shape diverse structures of
property rights and political authority -- the author is clear on one
point. Europe earned its wealth because nothing mattered more than
the fact that it ''was a good learner''. The most basic facility that
Europeans mastered was, he says, the power to kill.
They learnt
about gunpowder from Asia -- China originally -- but they learnt to
make it better and their guns fired straighter and farther. Then there
was mastery of latitude -- a great advance for oceanic navigation --
something the Europeans became good at after initial coaching from
Muslim astronomers via Jewish intermediaries. Mr Landes says that
the last of the Big Three -- the factors that caused Europe to take the
lead 500 years ago -- was printing with movable type. The Chinese
invented it but didn't have an alphabet, the Islamic world and India
refused it till the 19th century. The book goes on to list novelties that
Europeans made or found to improve their lives and understanding of
the world around -- eyeglasses, for instance, that doubled the
effective life of scribes and craftsmen; watches and so on. The book
celebrates the spirit of individualism and the economic shove that
comes with a cohesive national identity. But what it doesn't say is
where the West can possibly go from here. It doesn't -- and possibly
cannot answer - - the biggest question of them all: will the developing
and developed world remain antipodes of the whole?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext