Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (114315)	5/17/2005 5:50:00 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 793926

the point isn't what Newsweek intended here, it's what they did Fine, then criticize them for what they did, which was "they ran a wrong, single-source story," not for what their imagined intention was or for an exaggeration of their role in the effect. And how can you blame them? I can't blame them for being upset or angry. I'm not so charitable about unreasonableness, illogic, hyperbole... with no great news-worthiness I question that. Seems to me that the report of the findings from Abu Graib is newsworthy. Why would that not be newsworthy? And if the report is newsworthy, then a leak of the contents of the upcoming report is newsworthy, albeit reckless.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next