THE STARR REPORT Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE STARR REPORT

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (1142)	9/17/1998 8:31:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) of 1533

I've seen a mathematical breakdown showing the number of people Pres. Clinton must have met in his very-social lifetime and the statistics of the number who naturally would die anyway. Yes, but the list isn't of people who died naturally (except for Hubbard, if he did die naturally). The list doesn't include people Clinton knew who died of disease, old age, etc. The list is (except for Hubbard, where there is a question whether it was natural or assisted) only of people who died unnatural deaths. You can't compare apples and oranges. Look at the statistics of the number of people of people Clinton know who could have been expected to die by suicide or violently -- car crashes, airplane crashes, etc. Also, look at what percentage of the bodyguards who served other presidents died violently vs. the percentage of bodyguards serving other presidents who died violently (correcting for the number of years in service). Those are the comparisons that need to be made, and if you make them you'll find the statistics significantly disproportionate.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next