SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Newbridge Networks
NN 15.87+2.5%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peppe who wrote (11491)5/12/1999 7:07:00 PM
From: pat mudge   of 18016
 
Peppe ---

I haven't had time to watch the market but did read a few posts and thought you might enjoy a couple articles on IP/ATM:

jump.altavista.com

Cover story, May 10, 1999:

. . . . So far, though, IP doesn't appear to be a big player in the next generation networks. ATM is currently the protocol of choice, according to representatives from MCI WorldCom, Sprint and AT&T. When Sprint announced ION last June, rumors of IP were present, but CEO William Esrey struck that down. At Internet World last year, Esrey said, "We have chosen ATM, which fully supports IP, so that we can offer public-switched telephone voice quality now without losing the advantages offered by IP-based applications." But right after that statement, Esrey said, "Sprint is fully, completely committed to IP."

So if IP is the protocol of the future, why are the IXCs calling on ATM for their next generation networks?

"It has never been IP; it has always been ATM," says Ken McGee, an analyst with The Gartner Group. "It is part of the confusion factor to even compare IP with ATM. One is a protocol and the other is not a protocol per se, but a statistical multiplexing means to convey information."

So far, though, IP doesn't appear to be a big player in the next generation networks. ATM is currently the protocol of choice, according to representatives from MCI WorldCom, Sprint and AT&T. When Sprint announced ION last June, rumors of IP were present, but CEO William Esrey struck that down. At Internet World last year, Esrey said, "We have chosen ATM, which fully supports IP, so that we can offer public-switched telephone voice quality now without losing the advantages offered by IP-based applications." But right after that statement, Esrey said, "Sprint is fully, completely committed to IP."

So if IP is the protocol of the future, why are the IXCs calling on ATM for their next generation networks?

"It has never been IP; it has always been ATM," says Ken McGee, an analyst with The Gartner Group. "It is part of the confusion factor to even compare IP with ATM. One is a protocol and the other is not a protocol per se, but a statistical multiplexing means to convey information."


data.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext