SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: unclewest who wrote (115550)5/23/2005 3:38:47 PM
From: Maurice Winn   of 793919
 
It's inherently unethical to take a person's money by force to pay for a woman's abortion.

<//It's inherently unethical to usurp a mother's decisions about her offspring while they are part of her.//

Much of the debate about abortion in the US is centered on funding. Most abortions in the US are paid for by the government (our taxes).
>

If she wants an abortion, she or the impregnator should pay for it.

One could make a case that Homeland Security should pay for it because unwanted, rejected, unloved, hurt, angry ... etc babies grow into criminals too often, though adoption could take care of that.

Anyway, I'll drop the subject as I doubt that it's the purpose of this stream and it's a hot button topic which will turn to a mess.

Over and out.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext