SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Confluence who wrote (1161)5/20/1998 12:04:00 AM
From: INFOMAN  Read Replies (1) of 7235
 
It is definitely not the case that mineral rights not registered within 2 years revert to the state.
The Green paper you refer to , is still a discussion document which then has to become a white paper to be presented to Parliament and then if it is acceptable , becomes law.This rarely happens without major changes being made to the original Green paper.

There is no precedent for rights to revert to the state and I once again refer to my first posting:'3. As a result of the manner in which mineral rights were registered prior to 1937, it was impossible for an Executor to do a mineral search if he did not have the description of the property.This is an everyday occurrence and the Deeds Registries Act specifically makes provision for these cases in Section 71 thereof.'

I believe that the case will be heard on Thursday.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News