SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : OLED Universal Display Corp
OLED 118.18-2.2%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: STA2015 who wrote (11710)8/6/2017 5:08:44 PM
From: oled2b4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Advanced OLED
CycleTed
JimKelly
pholedphan

   of 29709
 
The last time we discuss this patent, my understanding was that the ten fold was not enough for commercialization. If my memory serve me, it bring us to a couple of hundred of hours. Now, I just read on the patent:

"Although the blue PHOLED lifetime reported here remains considerably less than that of red and green PHOLEDs at similar luminances, blue sub-pixels in displays operate at a considerably lower luminance than either the red or green sub-pixels. For example, the required luminance to achieve an sRGB color gamut for green is 9.9 times the luminance for blue. (Stokes, M., Anderson, M., Chandrasekar, S. & Motta, R. A standard default color space for the internet-srgb. Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard Joint Report (1996)). Thus, a comparison between blue and green PHOLED lifetimes for displays suggests that the blue PHOLED sub-pixel luminance needs to be only ˜10% that of the green. Under such conditions (i.e. 100 cd/m2), the TPA model estimate the blue PHOLED lifetime is 70,000 hr. Also, adopting a degradation acceleration factor that relates luminance to lifetime, viz."

google.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext