SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE
SPY 687.70+0.7%4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill who wrote (11747)11/30/2007 12:56:28 PM
From: pompsander  Read Replies (1) of 25737
 
"If it turns out that the hours incurred during his trysts were treated like any other hours from an expense standpoint, would you agree there was no pattern of obfuscation?"

Sorry, Counselor...your question is leading. The hours for the "trysts" were NOT treated like "any other hours". We already know that the vast majority of the security detail hours were charged to budgets relating to the direct protection of the mayor. Some of the "tryst" hours were parceled off to minor budgets. We don't yet know if other, non-tryst hours were also parceled out, but they could have been.

So since your question is flawed (any other hours weren't treated like the tryst hours - 98% or so were budgeted straight to the security budget according to the latest Policico article), I can't answer you.

And, yes, I have stopped beating my wife. <vbg>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News