SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Nadine Carroll6/4/2005 12:42:25 AM
   of 793725
 
Moment of unintended amusement on the BBC. The BBC World Service had Saeb Erekat on, and as usual, were letting him whine on and on for minutes with nary an interruption. He was carrying on with his usual line, it's all Israel's fault, they have to accede to every Pal demand right now or else it will be too late, I'm against corruption (highly amusing), I'm against terrorism (ditto), I'm a moderate, etc. etc. The usual. Then a new variant crept in. The BBC announcer decided to be just slightly skeptical, and asked, if you are really against the attacks, what about Fatah and Hamas, why don't you move to stop them? The answer Erekat gave was, we can't because Israel destroyed our police stations on 2002. This was so lame that the BBC announcer asked, But wasn't the intifada, the attacks, a deliberate policy of Yasser Arafat?

Could have knocked me down with a feather. That was certainly not an thought that had ever crossed the lips of a BBC reporter during the intifada, when Pal violence happened of itself, like earthquakes, and Arafat's protests were taken at face value. Erekat himself seemed a little taken aback by the unexpected question, but he quickly recovered and blamed Israel again.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext