That was an interesting site, but nowhere in it does it say that the principles of it cannot be applied to dealings with other countries. David, before you accuse me of being wrong on that point, call up the US Dept of Commerce and find out what you are talking about! Your interpretation of the agreements of other countries and the application of the agreement vs being a signatory to the entire agreement is only superficially on ... in reality, such international agreements are very commonplace.
What we are talking about is the application of a reciprocal trade agreement and in fact, I told you about the specific application in this case which is the wavier of duties on the importation of materials for these homes ... Again, you are asking if PRWT still kicks their dog ... Seldom is there anything so black letter as to say that no other country can apply parts of NAFTA to model their own international trade agreement. Now go back and read my post and how NAFTA principles apply to the dealings of Belize with American Trade! But, don't take my word for it, call the Dept of Commerce and ask them. It is all public knowledge and available to anyone who wants to find out, assuming that you really do want to find out and do not just want another reason to throw a tantrum.
David, since YOU are always right and no other possibility exists other than your own narrow tunnel vision, I really do not expect you to understand, much less realize that you might just be too narrow in your analysis or petty accusations. I have found that for you, noone who supports a stock can ever be right. It has to be a scam and you have to be in charge of the "told-ya-so" department. |
