THE ARTICLE MENTIONED IN PRIOR POST!
Absolutely worth reading
www.gold-eagle.com
This is powerful stuff.
from Ted Butler:
Unrelenting Misconduct
In my last article, I publicly accused at least six financial firms of fraud and manipulation, for their dealings in the precious metals derivatives arena. I'm still here. The
fact that none has responded or acknowledged my allegations can be interpreted in a number of ways. While it doesn't prove them guilty, it doesn't exonerate them
either. Their silence will not deter me. Since the manipulation of the price of gold and silver continues, I intend to turn up the heat.
To those who would say that I am just wasting my time, I suggest you take a look at what has been going on at Barrick Gold (and other heavily hedged miners). I've
written many articles about Barrick and I think it is starting to have an effect. This is a company that is trapped by, and may be starting to panic over its short position
in gold. Public reports indicate that the company has conducted a telephone survey of its big shareholders to learn their feelings on the company's hedging.
Additionally, it has been reported that Barrick has presented special seminars with those investors in the US and Europe to explain what their hedging is all about.
This is decidedly bad news for Barrick, for the simple reason that any attention that is drawn to the leasing/forward selling of gold and silver creates the real risk that
more people will become aware of the true scam that the leasing of precious metals actually is. I have witnessed with my own eyes the daily conversion of thinking
investors to the fact that leasing/forward selling is inherently fraudulent and manipulative. Barrick is crazy to draw attention to its shorts. This leasing and forward
selling cannot stand open scrutiny.
The recent controversy about Goldman Sachs and its relationship with its client Ashanti Goldfields, provides further insight into the murky world of precious metals
dealing, as well as the title of this piece. We are fortunate that this relationship has been made as public as it has, for it sheds more light on the gold and silver
manipulation and permits specific new accusations against Goldman. One is very ugly indeed.
Published reports (principally from London) have presented detail that paint Goldman Sachs in a far different light than is normally associated with the high powered
investment bank. For the record, I had contacted Goldman, once again, at the highest level prior to releasing this article, telling them the nature of this article and
giving them the opportunity to refute my claims. Once again, they have chosen not to respond nor refute. I can't beg them to address this issue. I have no personal
vendetta against Goldman (or Barrick or anyone else), my vendetta is against the crime of precious metals leasing and unlimited and unrestricted short selling in the
15 year manipulation in gold and silver. Goldman Sachs is a key player in that manipulation and as such, they are a fair target in light of recent revelations. Certainly,
no one can accuse me of being a bully towards Goldman, not when there is universal acceptance that Goldman Sachs is the bully of the entire precious metals
market. Let's face it, this firm is at the top of the food chain.
The dealings that Goldman Sachs had with their client Ashanti are sickening. It is hard to reconcile Goldman's actions in a world where the meaning of words such as
honesty, fiduciary responsibility, fairness and some concern for your fellow man, is known to all. If an individual lacked such basic traits, we would all consider that
unfortunate. For an institution like Goldman to lack such traits is unacceptable. The public record shows that Goldman misled Ashanti. Just a little bit of common
sense will prove it.
Step back for a moment, and try to put what happened in the Ashanti - Goldman relationship into proper perspective. Ashanti, which has only been a public
company for five years, increased its Goldman-sanctioned short strategy to the point where a $60 increase in the price of gold rendered it insolvent. Please think
about this. This was no renegade unauthorized trader gone wild. This was Ashanti's corporate policy. Goldman was their banker. Goldman knew, or should have
known, what Ashanti was doing. What Ashanti was doing was proving to the world just what a scam leasing/forward selling and derivatives are. For the first time in
history, a deliberate and widely known "hedging" strategy caused a public company to self-destruct financially. I wonder if that will go in Goldman's historical
milestones category of their web site. This was no financial accident. This was a direct and unavoidable result of the systemic fraud that leasing is. Your common
sense should tell you that something is wrong, when for the first time ever, higher prices for their product hurts producers. This Wall Street designed Ponzi scheme
has turned the metal world upside down, with producers actually rooting for lower prices. Bad things are destined to happen to the hundreds of mining companies
that resemble Ashanti. The blame can be placed squarely on Goldman Sachs and the other unethical dealers.
It is no wonder that Goldman Sachs and its counterparty posse were quick to white wash the mess they created at Ashanti. (An aside - I'm starting to believe that
"counterparty" means having a position that is counter to the best interests of your client). Since Ashanti couldn't meet its margin calls and no one has figured out how
to repossess real estate in Ghana, margin was waived by a "standstill" agreement. This is outrageous. Manipulative short sales which, by definition, were a price
depressant influence when initiated, were allowed to remain in place even after it became obvious that the short seller couldn't meet its obligations. Is it just me, or is
this not a direct affront to the concept of free markets? Those that had reassured themselves that the price depressing influence of all this obscene short selling would
be negated and offset by the eventual buyback or delivery, should rethink their position. Every action in this crises revolves around preventing Ashanti from buying
back its short position on the open market. Real gold and naked calls were sold on the open market at the outset of the transactions, but the requirement to
buy-back was unilaterally waived by the new rules of the crooked dealers, lest the price get out of hand. Goldman's and the counterparties' mopping up actions in
waiving margin requirements for Ashanti make them clearly guilty of market interference for the purpose of price fixing. I don't understand how the authorities can't,
or won't, see this. You would think, aside from reckless client negligence, that this would be the most severe charge one could bring against Goldman. I only wish
that were true.
Now I make an accusation that saddens me. It is an accusation that I have wrestled with, because it is so serious and ugly. The fact that I have offered
pre-notification to the party I am accusing, and asked them to set me straight, does not lighten the burden. It is an accusation that not only have I never made about
anyone, but one which I never thought I would ever make. But the evidence is so overwhelming, and the nature is so germane to the issue of fraud and manipulation
in gold and silver, that I feel I have no choice. I claim that Goldman Sachs, as part of its role in the sinful manipulation in gold and silver, is additionally guilty of racial
discrimination towards its client Ashanti Goldfields. Please allow me to explain.
First, as a white man, let me give you my definition of racial discrimination. You know I don't mince words. White men taking advantage of black men, because they
are black, is my definition of racism. Clearly, the record shows that this is what Goldman Sachs did to Ashanti in their financial dealings. The proof lies in the public
record.
It is no secret that Goldman Sachs has been the main financial advisor to Ashanti since its formation as a publicly-owned mining company in 1994. The recent
Financial Times article of December 2, 1999 describes the relationship fully (The title - "All Things to All Men"). Additionally, the 1998 Annual Review for Goldman
Sachs (www.gs.com) actually highlights Ashanti as one of 16 corporate clients (out of thousands) deserving special mention, including a testimonial by Ashanti about
how good Goldman was to them. The testimonial obviously predates the current situation.
Additionally, it is no secret that Ashanti led the gold mining world in the shortselling of gold and gold derivatives, compared to production. At its peak, Ashanti was
close to 12 million ounces short, or an incredible 8 years worth of production shorted. Barrick may be short more ounces, and some Australian miners may be short
more years, but Ashanti was acknowledged as being the most aggressive of the majors. That's the first observation, Goldman-advised Ashanti was the most
aggressive mining short seller. The obvious question - how did Ashanti get to be the most aggressive short seller of gold? Did they do it to themselves, or did
Goldman do it to them? Or, does it really matter - should Goldman, as its longtime financial advisor, have prevented Ashanti from being in the disaster short position
in the first place?
I think you have to look at each participant to determine if Goldman Sachs was racist in its dealings with Ashanti. Ashanti is in Ghana, in the African Gold Coast. The
country is poor, with a literacy rate of 60%, a life expectancy of 55 years, and 20% unemployment. The ethnic diversity is 99.8% black African and the GDP is $7
billion. (source www.ghanaweb.com). Ashanti Goldfields is the largest employer by far (around 10 thousand), and along with cocoa, gold provides the bulk of
Ghana's foreign exchange. Ashanti is overwhelmingly a black company, with a CEO who is a native Ghanaian and who worked himself up from a shift mine manager
position. Ashanti's current stock (ASL-NYSE) capitalization is roughly $350 million.
Goldman Sachs is a global financial powerhouse whose ranks are loaded with talented and educated overachievers. It will earn net profits of close to $2 billion this
year, and has a market capitalization of around $37 billion, or more than 100 times Ashanti's (Ashanti does produce a real product or true wealth, while Goldman is
a moneychanger, but that's a different topic). Hell, Goldman's market cap is 5 times the whole country's GDP. Goldman Sachs has been a pioneer and experienced
hand in the gold and silver leasing /forward selling scheme for over 15 years. Ashanti has been involved for maybe 4 years or so. Goldman has a tradition of
sophisticated financial dealings going back 130 years, the country of Ghana has only been independent for 40 years, mostly under military rule. Ashanti was
government owned until 1994. One fact that I can't provide is how much money white Goldman Sachs made off of black Ashanti. You can be sure the amount was
as obscene as racism itself.
It is not possible for a reasonable person to conclude that Ashanti, in any possible scenario, could hoodwink Goldman Sachs in a sophisticated game of dealing in
precious metals derivatives. So, if Ashanti has ended up on the ropes financially, who's fault is it? It's so clear, it's obnoxious. A new, unsophisticated investor versus
the master of the universe. Ashanti, of all the mining companies hurt by the price rise, had the highest concentration of "exotic"(aka "toxic waste") naked mutant calls.
Do you think that Ashanti dreamed up the terms and conditions of these derivatives that are polluting our financial markets? The white man (Goldman) tricked the
black man. That, my friends, is racism at the worst I have seen in thirty-five years. Goldman Sachs should be punished severely and stripped of any privilege of
dealing with any government entity. At the very least, I can't imagine how they could be allowed to continue in the metal business.
Even if you refuse to acknowledge this conclusion on the information I've provided, and somehow still think Goldman's role was proper, ask yourself this - why did a
majority of gold producing mining companies all do the same thing at roughly the same time? As I detailed in my last piece, there was an unnatural movement by all
sorts of mining companies to load up on dangerous short gold derivatives at precisely the wrong time. Was this the mining companies getting together to trick the
Wall Street Sharks?
In defense of Goldman, I don't think they are racist motivated. They are motivated by greed. They would steal from anyone, using any available method - in that
sense they are truly non-discriminatory. Racism was not the primary motive in Goldman's dealings with Ashanti - money was. But even though the people of
Goldman may not be personally racists, or the firm may not normally be considered a racist organization, motivation doesn't matter. The law (both moral and written)
doesn't distinguish - it is not permitted. The historic Civil Rights Movement that I personally witnessed was about eliminating institutional racial discrimination, and
hopefully individuals' minds in time. That's what makes Goldman's actions so repugnant - the racial discrimination they are guilty of is institutional in nature. That
Goldman's prime motivation in its dealings with Ashanti was not racial discrimination, doesn't excuse the fact that racial discrimination obviously existed. And it
should matter not that those discriminated against were not of our shores. Surely the law intended to preclude US companies from violating the civil rights of foreign
citizens.
Goldman's role in Ashanti's finances was so pervasive, that they can't walk away. In this sense, Ashanti is likely to be restructured, rather than liquidated, because
Goldman would really get a black eye otherwise. That, plus the mining assets can't be repossessed. Goldman might even arrange for a backroom covering of
Ashanti's shorts. But even if Goldman were to refund all fees, rescind all transactions and make Ashanti whole, that doesn't change the fact that Ashanti was clearly
racially discriminated against. And it doesn't lessen Goldman's involvement in the broader institutional fraud of leasing.
As disturbing as Goldman's transgressions against Ashanti are, I've always thought that one of the uglier aspects to the fraud and manipulation in gold and silver has
been the hardship borne by the individuals who actually toil down in the mines. Not only do they labor in an unbelievably difficult environment, they all too often are
deprived a livelihood because of the artificially depressed prices of gold and silver. Over the course of the leasing scam, hundreds of thousands of innocent people
(most of them black Africans) have been thrown out of work due to mine closures because of low prices. If that was because of legitimate supply/demand forces, it
remains just sad and unfortunate. But if it was because of a manipulative hand from the canyons of Wall Street, it is also outrageous and unacceptable. In this sense,
while I've singled out Goldman Sachs in their dealings with Ashanti, Goldman wasn't alone at Ashanti, nor in the overall leasing scheme. By artificially depressing the
price through their manipulative actions, AIG, Chase, JP Morgan, UBS and Republic Bank, and others, are also racists in the institutional discrimination against
laid-off black workers. That they also caused the non-racist unemployment of non-black or other minority mine workers, does not lessen their guilt, that crime is
separate to the discrimination.
So far, I've gone to the Federal Reserve, the Treasury, the Justice Dept., US Attorneys, the FTC, the Comptroller of the Currency, the CFTC (many times), and
mining companies and their auditors in trying to end this scam. Wouldn't it be something if what broke the back of the manipulators was a civil rights activist? The
authorities who should be on top of the scam obviously won't do it - so maybe someone from left field might do the trick. I've always known that if this fraud and
manipulation were as broad and deep as I've insisted over the years, the proof of its existence would manifest itself in many ways. But I must tell you, even I am
shocked about the recent revelations in this scam. Even I am taken back by the ugliness and evil that has sprung from an inherently flawed concept - metal leasing
and unlimited short selling.
Ted Butler
December 8, 1999
info@butlerresearch.com |
