SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 178.29-1.6%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ramsey Su who wrote (11995)6/25/2001 10:42:51 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Read Replies (1) of 196959
 
W-CDMA and cdma-2000 are not equally good for Qualcomm for at least the following reason.
That except for a few Scandinavian countries, UMTS licenses do not require universal coverage as do many GSM licenses. UMTS will be deployed in urban islands with GSM/GPRS being the fall back mode in outlying areas. Also UMTS requires a a more expensive dual mode, dual band UMTS/grps/gsm phones that will be too expensive for many users without a need for high speed data or multi-media. In a GSM/UMTS system many users who don't need or can't afford UMTS will continue to use simple and cheap GSM phones or GSM/GPRS if slow speed data is good enough for their needs.

Therefore it does make a difference to Qualcomm whether a TDMA system goes to GSM/GPRS/UMTS or CDMA-2000. In a CDMA-2000 system all users have CDMA phones, from high end multimedia phones to simple voice only economy models. While if a TDMA carrier switches to GSM/GPRS/UMTS only the high end users in urban areas have the CDMA UMTS phones.

In many ways UMTS acts as a life line for GSM. It provides high speed data service for the urban elite while leaving GSM in place for the rest of the market. The success of UMTS means a smaller market for CDMA than if CDMA-2000 becomes wider spread.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext