Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: grusum who wrote (121001)	1/2/2012 2:44:05 PM
From: Neeka	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 224729

I would say I believe in the constitution and am more conservative by nature. I believe the foundation of our country lies within the laws and rights as framed in the constitution by our Founders. I support conservative judges who are much more likely to interpret our laws as defined in the constitution as opposed to liberal judges who make law up as they go along. To me liberalism is the same as socialism/communism/progressiveness. I find nothing progressive about liberalism, but rather a stodgy old penchant for a world in which the masses are ruled by one "leader." who believes in "leveling the playing field", and ensuring he/she 'spreads the wealth around" as BO said during the run up to the '08 election. Progressives/liberals don't believe in individuality but a world in which we are all members of one homogenous group. I believe that is complete and utter hogwash. I find it very disturbing that Mitt Romney keeps flip flopping. It's gotten to the point where I can't trust what the guy says. en.wikipedia.org What is your definition? perhaps we should define these terms: 1) conservative 2) liberal

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next