SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Koligman who wrote (121087)3/1/2010 3:33:14 PM
From: Freedom Fighter   of 132070
 
I think this is one reason that a flat tax makes a lot of sense.

If you eliminate all (or most) tax deductions, you eliminate the ability of the private sector to use government to minimize the tax bills of certain people, industries etc... at the expense of others. Not only would that be fairer, it would be economically superior.

Of course, since such a high percentage of people in this country are "net" receivers of benefits (pay no taxes at all after adding back their government benefits), there probably should not be any taxes on income up to "X" dollars. Then the flat rate would kick in.

I also think we should move away from taxes on capital (interest, dividend, and capital gains) and move towards consumption taxes. To keep it less regressive, items like food, beverages, and other requirements of life could be exempt and luxury items could be targeted.

I am generally against using tax policy to manipulate the economy or behavior, but as long as we have already moved towards such a economically moronic and less free society, we are going to need substantial tax revenue. So we might as well do it in a way that does the least damage over the long haul instead of trying to maximize the short term at the expense of the long term or playing class warfare.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext