that's completely false.
no wonder you are confused and easily manipulated.
you don't determine an answer and then fit the evidence to it.
you test the facts, develop evidence and then reach logical conclusions and test them.
if they stand up, you have a pretty good theory. if not, you try again.
unless you don't want to know the answers.
we need evidence in order to determine who was involved.
we know the government (both parties) are covering up. what we don't know is who and what they are covering up for.
we some evidence, but it isn't nearly as strong as the evidence for controlled demolition of the three WTC buildings.
for example, a conservative think tank declared a new pearl harbor would be required to increase american dominance about a year before 911.
we know cheney and rumsfeld were part of the group.
we know a new pearl harbor occurred on 911 and we know cheney's team then proceeded to accelerate the plan for world dominance.
we also know that cheney declared the right to control norad 3 months prior to 911.
we also know that cheney took control of norad and purposefully allowed at least one plane to hit the pentagon - he was repeatedly warned it was incoming and did nothing.
we also know that bush has either imagined a scenario that happened to him on 911 or he's lying.
we know obama is towing the party line of avoiding any further investigation.
we know that on both 9/11 and 7/7 the government was conducting drills at the exact same terrorist locations about very similar events to those that actually occurred.
we know the media is also towing the party line and trying to demonize people who want to, shall we say...
question boldly!
no discourse - just ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK!
doesn't beck HATE the families of 911 victims? i think he said that, did he not?
shut up about molten steel, thermite residue, perfectly angled cuts with molten steel on the base supports, the underground explosions that occurred just before the buildings collapsed!
only question what beck tells to question.
of course, beck wants nothing to with questioning boldly - he wants to paint people who question boldly as potential terrorists.
is this absolute proof? nope.
but it is evidence we need to investigate further.
something the government and the media FEAR VERY MUCH.
but don't question boldly, just claim this is settled, pay al gore and the warmists their royalty and move on. -lol- |
