Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Snowshoe who wrote (121349)	6/22/2005 5:44:57 AM
From: JDN	of 793771

I see that. I am disappointed Jeep isnt in the list. Seems like the perfect vehicle to make a flexible fuel engine for. I suppose there hasnt been a need as there is no availability of 85% ethanol fuel. I could live with the Government MANDATING that all new vehicles be flexible fuel (so long as the cost is reasonable, like no more then $200 per vehicle which is what I have seen quoted), then as the fuel becomes available there will be vehicles to run it. Frankly, I am enthused about the prospect. I see it as a BOON for the USA. With the ability to contribute to the fuel crisis I bet we could ELIMINATE FARM SUBSIDIES as well as SUGAR SUBSIDIES, reduce greatly our Balance of Payments Deficit and finally be FREE of foreign influence over our economy. jdn

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next