SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : EMC How high can it go?
EMC 29.050.0%Sep 15 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pirate_200 who wrote (12138)2/12/2001 2:33:39 PM
From: Gus  Read Replies (1) of 17183
 
You're a waste of time. You react emotionally to the fact that NTAP's receivables have grown faster than sales during each of the last 3 quarters. You can't even figure out that NTAP is growing much slower than the overall NAS market. A calm and rational discussion with you is impossible.

Here's a good example of how illogical you're becoming:

EMC had the perfect opportunity at the IP4700 introduction to choose a configuration that was exactly the same as NTAP's: RAM, disks, controllers etc. and show their superiority.... they didn't.

Why?

1) The IP4700 chassis can support up to 100 disk drives behind 2 storage processors which contains 2 PIII processors each.

2) The F840 chassis can support up to 168 disk drives behind one, I repeat, one PIII processor.

3) The IP4700 (NAS) can also be converted to the FC4700 (SAN) with a simple change of the interface card (Gigabit Ethernet to Fibre Channel) and software. The F840 does not offer that option because NTAP did not invest in SANs.

I ask again, why?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext