SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (121708)6/23/2005 12:23:07 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 793885
 
if there's no evidence, what's wrong with letting them go? Isn't that what we're supposed to do if there's no evidence?

If we're going to require evidence, why bother to capture them in the first place? If we're going to send them back, why not just leave them there? When we get into a firefight, when it's over and they are dead or disarmed, we can just walk away. In that scenario, though, do you think it would be too much if we captured their weapons so they couldn't shoot us while we're walking away but would have to go back to their bases first and get fresh ones?

Pardon the edge in that but I'm really having trouble figuring out where you are coming from. What I'm picking up here on the receiving end is not making any sense to me.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News