Wharfie, I don't know if they interfered with anybody's ability to vote. Bottom line is that they didn't. Next ...
Aside from the fact that they are foreigners, overseas, working for an adversary? That is a meaningless distinction. Shark Fin Soup is a foreigner who is working for an adversary to Trump. But you don't think he's interfering with the 2020 election.
Tell me you know that hacking is against the law, and tell me you've heard that emails from hacked accounts showed up on wikileaks, and that you know one does not have to send out emails from hacked accounts in order to be in violation of the above-mentioned hacking laws. Hacking is indeed against the law, but once again, you still can't tell me how that has interfered with your ability to vote, or anyone else's ability to vote.
Besides, publishing leaked, confidential info is what the mainstream media does all the time. CNN, NYTimes, and Democracy Dies In Darkness all post leaked memos and statements from "anonymous sources."
Even Rachel Maddow got a hold of Trump's tax returns, which was supposed to be confidential. How did she get that? Don't tell me it was through legal means like an FOIA request.
Again, you still have not told me how anyone's ability to vote was "interfered" with. All you have done is tell me how the Russians published info that was inconvenient for the Democrats.
Of course, if your definition of "interference" was "anything that interferes with the Democrats' ability to win elections," then what I can say?
Tenchusatsu |
